(c)iStock.com/AndreyPopov
One is that marketers are afraid to try new items.
This appears to have changed around the time of the 2008 recession, before which people used to get budgets and advertising was than it is now.
Since then entrepreneurs have essentially become spreadsheet administrators and started thinking: “Oh look, this ROI has gone up a bit so let’s spend more on this and less on that”, whilst ignoring the big picture of multichannel effect and brand building.”
With such a strong focus on testing, what has been missing?
If you look in the world’s largest advertisers and Coca Cola, they invest more on display sponsorships, advertisements, billboards and TV than anybody else on the whole world, since they understand it works and they don’t even measure it efficiently.
Personalisation and automation works 90% of their time but the detrimental brand impact from the other 10 percent is enormous
Whereas people somehow want to deconstruct promotion campaigns and consumer behaviour into spread sheets that inhibits the power of what advertising is, which is a mental ploy.
How effectively is content and messaging is being tested?
Content is basically, incontrovertibly being tested. People do one of two things:
- They will test out micro changes, but then you receive micro enhancements, so they are constantly pursuing the tiny 0.1% uplift. Since when was great?
- They will test out two completely random things and among those options will win and they will Begin moving “oh great that entirely won,” and they won’t have a learning methodology instead of actually forward it on to future marketing outcomes
Advice for entrepreneurs attempting to create meaningful changes
One of the key inhibitors of progress is that when entrepreneurs attempt to take risks, they must develop a whole company case and they have to do an entire report on it afterwards, and when it did not work there is this whole kind of shaming aspect that happens afterward.
If companies want to transform themselves then is knock out this shame-based spread sheet and embrace failure.
I would love to see companies start to provide marketing teams budgets that are discretionary. How are you supposed to do if you spend the majority of your time justifying why you 18, testing? By then, the moment’s passed.
What’s wrong with personalisation?
I find what marketers do nowadays is hear a buzzword and jump on to the bandwagon. In 2007, it was Internet 2.0; three years back it was large data; and today it is all about personalisation.
There’s really nothing wrong with mass marketing.
It’s true: whether it is online or offlineadvertising functions. But marketers are trying to apply these extreme personalisation techniques from focusing energies within this 33, in stations that, while it may be technically allowed by them, creates a huge brand opportunity price.
Personalisation and automation works 90 percent of their time but the detrimental brand impact from another 10 percent is huge — destroy trust and it’s quite simple to automate spam.
Following my divorce, I kept my ex-wife’s devotion card to quite a well-known retailer (she got everything else). This retailer is intended to be the very best at this stuff, but to this day I get because I haven’t brought tampons in two years so I have to have run out emails that are perfectly personalised offering discounts on tampons.
Another illustration is a Valentine’s email my buddy received from Amazon this season, which was saying “buy something pleasant on Valentine’s Day” and the characteristic product was atoilet brush! Because it is statistically likely she needs to purchase a toilet brush it must have occurred, but it is on a Valentine’s email?
If these guys can not get personalisation right, then it raises questions that are real for the rest of us.
